Objective: To explore the relationship between anxiety status and progestogen level in perimenopausal women and their effects on the pathogenesis of uterine fibroid.
Methods: A total of 376 perimenopausal women who visited the Department of Gynecology and Neurology of Nanjing Tongren Hospital affiliated School of Medicine of Southeast University from August 2019 to July 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Based on the and divided into two groups according to the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), they were divided into a non-anxiety group (n=202, SAS score< 50) and an anxiety group (n=174, SAS score≥50). Additionally, according to the presence or absence of uterine fibroids, they were categorized into a non-uterine fibroid group (n=225) and a uterine fibroid group (n=151). The t test or χ2 test was used to compare general demographic and clinical data between the non-uterine fibroid group and the uterine fibroid group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between anxiety status, progesterone level, and uterine fibroid risk in perimenopausal women. The bootstrap method was used to analyze whether progesterone level mediate the relationship between anxiety status and uterine fibroid risk.
Results: Comparison of baseline data between the non-uterine fibroid group and the uterine fibroid group showed that previous caesarean section, number of abortions, hemoglobin level, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were not associated with the incidence of uterine fibroid (all P > 0.05). In contrast, menstrual period, menstrual cycle, progesterone level, and SAS score were significantly associated with the incidence of uterine fibroid (all P < 0.05). Analysis of the effects of different clinical features on the risk of uterine fibroid showed that age, chronic diseases history, and dysmenorrhea history were all significantly associated with the incidence of uterine fibroid in perimenopausal women (all P < 0.05). Further, univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age≥55 years, chronic diseases, and dysmenorrhea were significant risk factors for uterine fibroid in perimenopausal women (all P < 0.05). These seven significant risk factors (menstrual period, menstrual cycle, progesterone level, SAS score, age, chronic disease history, and dysmenorrhea history) were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis , which identified SAS score and progesterone level as independent risk factors for uterine fibroid in perimenopausal women. Specifically, SAS score was positively correlated with uterine fibroid risk, while progesterone level was negatively correlated with the risk. Restriction cubic spline analysis showed a nonlinear quantitative response relationship between continuously changing progesterone level and the risk of uterine fibroid (χ2 = 12.315, P < 0.001), when progesterone level was ≤2.00 ng/mL, the risk of uterine fibroid decreased with the increase of progesterone level (HR=1.014, 95% CI: 1.006-1.012, P < 0.001), and when progesterone level was > 2.00 ng/mL, the risk of uterine fibroid stabilized with further increases in progesterone level (HR=1.003, 95% CI: 0.998-1.002, P = 0.001). After further adjusting for a variety of related confounding factors affecting the incidence of uterine fibroid in perimenopausal women, it was found that SAS score was an independent risk factor for predicting the incidence of uterine fibroid in perimenopausal women. Mediation effect analysis revealed that SAS score had a direct effect on the incidence of uterine fibroid (β1=0.202, 95% CI: 0.124-0.216), and progesterone level partially mediated the effect of SAS score on uterine fibroid risk (β2 = 0.196, 95% CI: 0.152-0.207). The total effect value was βtotal=0.398, and the mediating effect accounted for 49.25% of the total effect.
Conclusion: There was an independent correlation between anxiety status and progestogen level in perimenopausal women, anxiety status was a risk factor for the development of uterine fibroids, while progestogen levelwas a protective factor.